Geyser
GeyserInventor's Platform
How It WorksPricingFAQDirectoryMethodologyLogin / Sign Up

Drafting Tool

  • How It Works
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • User Agreement

Directory

  • Attorney Directory
  • Methodology
  • Reports & Analysis
  • Citation Guidelines

Technology Areas

  • Computing & Software
  • Telecommunications
  • Medical & Health
  • Electrical Components
  • Vehicles & Transport

Resources

  • USPTO ↗
  • CPC Classification ↗

Geyser Patent Attorney Directory

Geyser™ is a SaaS technology platform operated by Geyser LLC, a d/b/a of Sembrose LLC. Geyser LLC is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Use of the platform does not create an attorney-client relationship. All outputs are AI-generated preliminary drafts. Geyser LLC strongly recommends that a registered patent practitioner review all outputs before filing with the USPTO or any patent office.

Privacy Policy|Terms of Service|User Agreement
Directory/Physical & Chemical Processes

Physical & Chemical Processes

B01

As of March 2026, the Geyser Patent Attorney Directory contains 534 patent practitioners with verified filing records in Physical & Chemical Processes (CPC B01). These practitioners have filed a combined 15 patent applications, of which 8 have been granted, a 53.3% allowance rate.

534
Practitioners
15
Patents Filed
8
Patents Granted
53.3%
Allowance Rate

PatentFit Score Distribution

534 practitioners

How 534 Physical & Chemical Processes practitioners score on PatentFit

Exceptional85-100
0(0%)
Strong70-84
0(0%)
Good50-69
213(40%)
Moderate30-49
135(25%)
Limited0-29
186(35%)

Filing Trend

Annual patent filings in CPC B01

1
10
1
12
2
20
2
24
6
25

Top Firms in Chemical Processes

Firms with the most Physical & Chemical Processes patent filings

1
Solo Practitioner
44 practitioners12 patents
2
PERKINS COIE LLP
45 practitioners3 patents
3
MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C
10 practitioners2 patents
4
PERKINS COIE, LLP
11 practitioners2 patents
5
KNOBBE MARTENS
14 practitioners2 patents
6
PERKINS COIE
6 practitioners2 patents
7
CONDO ROCCIA KOPTIW LLP
1 practitioners1 patents
8
COLBY NIPPER PLLC
1 practitioners1 patents

Find your top Physical & Chemical Processes match

Search the full Geyser directory to see individual practitioners ranked by PatentFit Score for your specific technology.

Search Chemical Processes Attorneys on Geyser

USPTO Art Units

24842 patents
21172 patents
21221 patents
21251 patents
21271 patents
21711 patents
21751 patents
21781 patents

Practitioners by State

CA261
DC83
NY37
WA28
PA20
MA18
TX13
VA13
IL12
NJ10
NC8
SC5
AZ5
AL4
CO4

About CPC B01

Patent expertise in separation, mixing, atomization, and chemical process equipment.

View CPC definition ↗

Frequently Asked Questions About Physical & Chemical Processes Patent Attorneys

How many patent practitioners specialize in Physical & Chemical Processes?

As of March 2026, the Geyser Patent Attorney Directory database contains 534 patent practitioners with verified filing records in Physical & Chemical Processes (CPC B01). These practitioners have filed a combined 15 patent applications in this technology area, with 8 granted (53.3% allowance rate).

What is the allowance rate for Physical & Chemical Processes patents?

The allowance rate for patent applications classified under Physical & Chemical Processes (CPC B01) is 53.3% in our database. The USPTO-wide average is approximately 61.6%. Practitioners with high PatentFit Scores in this area significantly outperform this average.

How do I find the best patent attorney for my Physical & Chemical Processes invention?

The Geyser Patent Attorney Directory analyzes 534 practitioners with proven filing records in Physical & Chemical Processes. Of these, 0 have PatentFit Scores rated "Strong" or "Exceptional," indicating deep specialization. You can search for your specific technology match on our directory.

What is PatentFit and how does it help me choose a patent attorney?

PatentFit is a composite score (0-100) measuring how well a practitioner's actual filing record aligns with a specific technology area. It combines Specialization Depth (35%), Allowance Rate (25%), Filing Recency (20%), and Experience (20%). Full methodology at https://patentgeyser.com/methodology.

Does location matter when choosing a Physical & Chemical Processes patent attorney?

No. Patent practitioners are registered with the USPTO, a federal agency with nationwide jurisdiction. A patent attorney in any U.S. state can file and prosecute patent applications for inventors located anywhere. What matters is their proven expertise in your specific technology area.